YARS1
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by their cognate amino acid. Because of their central role in linking amino acids with nucleotide triplets contained in tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are thought to be among the first proteins that appeared in evolution. Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase belongs to the class I tRNA synthetase family. Cytokine activities have also been observed for the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, after it is split into two parts, an N-terminal fragment that harbors the catalytic site and a C-terminal fragment found only in the mammalian enzyme. The N-terminal fragment is an interleukin-8-like cytokine, whereas the released C-terminal fragment is an EMAP II-like cytokine.
provided by RefSeq
Biological Domains
Apoptosis, Immune Response, Proteostasis
Pharos Class
Tchem
Also known as
ENSG00000134684 (Ensembl Release 114)
UNIPROTKB P54577
CMTDIC, IMNEPD2, TYRRS, YARS, YRS, YTS
Summary of Evidence
This tab shows an overview of how the selected gene is associated with AD.
Genetic Association with LOAD
Indicates whether or not this gene shows significant genetic association with Late Onset AD (LOAD) based on evidence from multiple studies compiled by the ADSP Gene Verification CommitteeFalseBrain eQTL
Indicates whether or not this gene locus has a significant expression Quantitative Trait Locus (eQTL) based on an AMP-AD consortium studyTrueRNA Expression Change in AD Brain
Indicates whether or not this gene shows significant differential expression in at least one brain region based on AMP-AD consortium work. See ‘EVIDENCE’ tab.TrueProtein Expression Change in AD Brain
Indicates whether or not this gene shows significant differential protein expression in at least one brain region based on AMP-AD consortium work. See ‘EVIDENCE’ tab.TrueNominated Target
Indicates whether or not this gene has been submitted as a nominated target to Agora.True
AD Risk Scores
About AD Risk Scores
The TREAT-AD Center at Emory-Sage-SGC has developed a Target Risk Score (TRS) to objectively rank the potential involvement of specific genes in AD. The TRS is derived by summing two component risk scores, the Genetic Risk Score and the Multi-omic Risk Score, each of which is derived from a meta-analysis of multiple harmonized data sets. More information about the methodology used to define these risk scores is available here.
AD Risk Scores for YARS1
The TRS for YARS1, along with the component Genetic and Multi-omic Risk Scores, is shown here. The scores for YARS1 are superimposed on the genome-wide score distributions. If No Data is Currently Available is displayed for a score, that score was not calculated for YARS1.
Biological Domain Classification
About Biological Domains
A biological domain represents a standardized area of biology defined by a set of discrete, biologically coherent GO terms. The TREAT-AD Center at Emory-Sage-SGC has defined nineteen biological domains associated with AD, and objectively mapped genes to those biological domains using GO term annotations. More information about the methodology used to define AD biological domains, and to generate genome-wide biological domain mappings, is available here.
Biological Domains for YARS1
Select a biological domain on the left to see the list of GO terms that link YARS1 to it on the right. The percentage value displayed next to the currently selected biological domain indicates the proportion of YARS1's total unique GO terms that map to the biological domain. The ratio displayed on the right indicates how many of the biological domain's total GO terms YARS1 is annotated with.
RNA Expression
The results shown on this page are derived from a harmonized RNA-seq analysis of post-mortem brains from AD cases and controls. The samples were obtained from three human cohort studies across a total of nine different brain regions.
Overall Expression of YARS1 Across Brain Regions
This plot depicts the median expression of the selected gene across brain regions, as measured by RNA-seq read counts per million (CPM) reads. Meaningful expression is considered to be a log2 CPM greater than log2(5), depicted by the red line in the plot.
Filter the following charts by statistical model
Differential Expression of YARS1 Across Brain Regions
After selecting a statistical model, you will be able to see whether the selected gene is differentially expressed between AD cases and controls. The box plot depicts how the differential expression of the selected gene of interest (purple dot) compares with expression of other genes in a given tissue. Summary statistics for each tissue can be viewed by hovering over the purple dots. Meaningful differential expression is considered to be a log2 fold change value greater than 0.263, or less than -0.263.
Consistency of Change in Expression
This forest plot indicates the estimate of the log fold change with 95% confidence interval across the brain regions in the model chosen using the filter above. Genes that show consistent patterns of differential expression will have similar log-fold change value across brain regions.
Correlation of YARS1 with Hallmarks of AD
This plot depicts the association between expression levels of the selected gene in the DLPFC and three phenotypic measures of AD. An odds ratio > 1 indicates a positive correlation and an odds ratio < 1 indicates a negative correlation. Statistical significance and summary statistics for each phenotype can be viewed by hovering over the dots.
Similarly Expressed Genes
The network diagram below is based on a coexpression network analysis of RNA-seq data from AD cases and controls. The network analysis uses an ensemble methodology to identify genes that show similar coexpression across individuals.
The color of the edges and nodes indicates how frequently significant coexpression was identified. Each node represents a different gene and the amount of edges within the network. Darker edges represent coexpression in more brain regions.
Proteomics
Proteomic analyses of post-mortem brains show whether protein products of YARS1 are differentially expressed between AD cases and controls. Each box plot depicts how the differential expression of the protein(s) of interest (purple dot) compares with expression of other proteins in a given brain region. Summary statistics for each tissue can be viewed by hovering over the purple dots.
Targeted SRM Differential Protein Expression
Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) data was generated from the DLPFC region of post-mortem brains of over 1000 individuals from multiple human cohort studies.
Note that only a single SRM result is available for a given gene, as the probes used for this experiment were designed to match multiple protein products derived from each targeted gene.
Genome-wide Differential Protein Expression
Select a protein from the dropdown menu to see whether it is differentially expressed between AD cases and controls.
The assay-specific box plots below depict how the differential expression of the selected protein of interest (purple dot) compares with expression of other proteins in each brain region that was assayed. Assay-specific summary statistics for each brain region can be viewed by hovering over the purple dot.
Multiple proteins may map to a single gene. Results from both TMT and LFQ assays are provided, however results for some proteins may be available for only one of the assays.
TMT Differential Protein Expression
Tandem mass tagged (TMT) data was generated from the DLPFC region of post-mortem brains of 400 individuals from the ROSMAP cohort.
Note that proteins may not be detected in this brain region; for these proteins, the plot will show no data.
LFQ Differential Protein Expression
Liquid-free quantification (LFQ) data was generated from post-mortem brains of more than 500 individuals. Samples were taken from four human cohort studies, representing four different brain regions.
Note that proteins may not be detected in all four brain regions; for these proteins, the plot will show fewer than four brain regions.
Metabolomics
The results shown on this page are derived from an analysis of metabolite levels from AD cases and controls. The samples were obtained from approximately 1400 individuals from the ADNI study. Metabolites are associated with genes using genetic mapping and the metabolite with the highest genetic association is shown for each gene.
Mapping of Metabolites to YARS1
No metabolomic data is currently available.
Levels of Metabolite by Disease Status
This plot shows differences in metabolite levels in AD cases and controls.
Drug Development Resources
These external sites provide information and resources related to drug development.
Additional Resources
These external sites provide additional information about therapeutic targets for AD and related dementias.
Evidence Supporting the Nomination of YARS1
This gene has been nominated as a potential target for AD. Nominated targets are obtained from several sources, including the National Institute on Aging's Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Alzheimer's Disease (AMP-AD) consortium. Targets have been identified using computational analyses of high-dimensional genomic, proteomic and/or metabolomic data derived from human samples.
AMP-AD: Emory University
The Emory AMP-AD team, led by Allan Levey, focuses on the generation and analysis of proteomic data to understand neurodegenerative disease. Targets nominated by the Emory team have been identified through the analysis of differential protein expression and co-expression network analysis.
Why was the target selected?
YARS was identified as a potential driver protein based on protein coexpression analysis of the BLSA cohort(s). YARS has unchanged or inconsistent change in abundance in AD across the examined cohorts.
Predicted therapeutic direction
Unknown.
The type of data used and analyses done to identify target
Discovery quantitative proteomics of FrCx, WPCNA of multiple and consensus cohorts, ANOVA
Cohort study data: ACT, BLSA, Banner
Initial date of nomination
2018
Planned Experimental Validation
not prioritized for experimental validation
Learn more about the target nomination process